CJA 320 CJA320 CJA/320 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

Description

CJA 320 CJA320 CJA/320 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

CJA 320 Module 1 Assignment 3 The Interview Process

CJA 320 Module 3 Assignment 2 LASA 1 Interview Techniques

CJA 320 Module 4 Assignment 2 Constitutional Amendments and Miranda

CJA 320 Module 5 Assignment 1 LASA 2 Interviewing/Interrogating for the Robbery at the Centervale Grocery Emporium

CJA 320 CJA320 CJA/320 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

CJA 320 Module 3 Assignment 2 LASA 1 Interview Techniques

Prepare a 9- to 10-page Microsoft Word document which accommodates the following:

• Compare and contrast the fundamental concepts of communication in an investigatory interview and an interrogation. Analyze and explain whether the communication in this scenario would be classified as an interview or an interrogation. Apply the comparison and contrast information, the script, and external resources to support your position, and rationale.
• Analyze and discuss at least two different confession elicitation tactics that were used by Officer Stone in an effort to get Marty to confess. Contrast one of these tactics with a tactic that might have been less effective in this situation.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of Officer Stone’s efforts. Analyze and discuss a key area of strength and weakness in his approach. Identify any fundamental legal issues that Officer Stone may encounter related to how he handled this situation and his choice of tactics.
• Evaluate how you would have executed this communication in order to achieve the confession? Use empirical research in support of your evaluation; suggest how to improve an area of weakness and how to overcome any other obstacles you can identify in this situation.
• Predict what would happen if Marty implicated his friend Joe? Identify the questions that should be asked to provide evidence to Marty’s claim?

CJA 320 CJA320 CJA/320 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

CJA 320 Module 4 Assignment 2 Constitutional Amendments and Miranda

As a law enforcement investigator, it is critical for you to know and understand the components and applications of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution and the Miranda case. From the law enforcement officer assigned to patrol an area of his or her jurisdiction to the detective assigned to follow up on homicide cases, each needs to have skills to legally conduct investigations that are admissible in court and eligible for prosecution. It does not serve patrol officers or homicide detectives to develop criminal cases that are not prosecutable.

This assignment directs you to explore and discover the attributes and scope as well as specific legal components of each of the above-mentioned constitutional amendments.

Tasks:

Compose a 5- to 7-page report addressing both Part 1 and 2.

Part 1

Utilizing a minimum of three sources, such as course readings as well as the additional readings, define and discuss the implications of each of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as well as the Miranda case law on executing interrogations.

Part 2

It is equally critical that law enforcement investigators understand how the aforementioned constitutional amendments are applicable to real-world situations. This assignment directs you to demonstrate the ability of specific legal components of the listed constitutional amendments to apply the legal doctrine.

Use the following sources to identify at least one specific case and apply at least two of the constitutional provisions to the outcome of the case:

• http://crime.about.com/od/current/a/case_news.htm
• http://www.hg.org/law-articles-criminal-law.asp