CJA 426 CJA426 CJA/426 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

Description

CJA 426 CJA426 CJA/426 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

CJA 426 Module 1 Assignment 3 Terrorist Motivation

CJA 426 Module 2 Assignment 2 No Fly List

CJA 426 Module 3 Assignment 2 LASA 1 Security Proposal for Centervale

CJA 426 Module 4 Assignment 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction

CJA 426 Module 5 Assignment 1 LASA 2 Centervale and Counterterrorism

CJA 426 CJA426 CJA/426 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

CJA 426 Module 1 Assignment 3 Terrorist Motivation

Terrorism exists for various reasons. For some individuals, the issue of terrorism is rooted in a clash of ideology. Others contend that terrorism is a “clash of civilizations.” (Fiala, 2007, p. 165).

With the fight against terrorism launched in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Middle East, many in the Muslim world feel that America is evil and that its ways are misguided. In fact, some say that you need look no further than the Abu Ghraib scandal, where administrative evil was displayed (Adams, Balfour, & Reed, 2006, p. 680).

In addition, experts would argue that many terrorist attacks are not conducted by crazy people, but rather by intelligent and religiously motivated individuals who could be seen as martyrs (Guss, Tuason, & Teixeira, 2007, p. 417).

Tasks:

Prepare a 3- to 4-page report to answer the following questions.

• Analyze and explain the differences in ideology that might force an individual to commit a terroristic act?
• Do you think terrorists could be viewed as martyrs? Why?
• Do you think people who are willing to give their life for their cause are sane and rational or insane and irrational? Why?

References:

Adams, G., Balfour, D., & Reed, G. (2006). Abu Ghraib, administrative evil, and moral inversion: The value of “putting cruelty first.” Public Administrative Review, 66(5), 680–693.

Fiala, A. (2007). Crusades, just wars, and the Bush doctrine. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 19(2), 165–172.

Guss, C. D., Tuason, M. T., & Teixeira, V. B. (2007). A cultural–psychological theory of contemporary Islamic martyrdom. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 37(4),
415–445.

CJA 426 CJA426 CJA/426 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

CJA 426 Module 2 Assignment 2 No Fly List

The No Fly List is created and maintained by the US government’s Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) to screen those individuals who are not permitted to travel in a commercial aircraft within or outside the United States (Ross, 2010).

The No Fly List is different from the Terrorist Watch List, which is a much bigger list of people suspected of involvement in terrorist acts (Ross, 2010).

Nevertheless, the No Fly List has been criticized on grounds of violating civil liberties and on due process grounds, due, in part, to the potential for ethnic, religious, economic, political, or racial profiling and discrimination (Friscolanti & Patriquin, 2008, p. 50).

In addition, the No Fly List contains the names of people who are dead, prisoners, and at least 1,000 duplicate names—that is, people with similar names as those on the No Fly List are stopped for questioning when they have no nexus with terrorism (Donnelly, 2004, p. 17).

Tasks:

Prepare a 3- to 4-page report to answer the following questions:

• Do you consider the No Fly List as discriminatory in nature and violating an individual’s civil rights? Why?
• Do you agree with the statement, “the No Fly List is one of the best lines of defense” (Ross, 2010)? Why?
• Do you agree to the statement, “the No Fly List is costly, prone to false positives, and easily defeated” (Ross, 2010)? Why?

References:

Donnelly, S. B. (2004, October). Should the No-Fly List be grounded? Time, 16, p. 17. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,995387,00.html

Friscolanti, M., & Patriquin, M. (2008). Caught in the no-fly web. Maclean’s, 121(37), 50–52.

Ross, B. (2010). Why no-fly? Nightline ABC, p.1–1.