-45%

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

$149.99$275.00

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 1 iLab Sallen-Key Active Filter Design

ECET 350 Week 2 Homework

ECET 350 Week 2 iLab Signal Sampling and Reconstruction

ECET 350 Week 3 Homework

ECET 350 Week 3 iLab Moving Average Digital Filters

ECET 350 Week 4 Homework

ECET 350 Week 4 iLab Low-Pass Finite Impulse Response Filter

ECET 350 Week 5 Homework

ECET 350 Week 5 iLab Impulse Response Band Pass Filter

ECET 350 Week 6 Homework

ECET 350 Week 6 iLab Infinite Impulse Response Low-Pass Filter

ECET 350 Week 7 Homework

ECET 350 Week 7 iLab Fourier Analysis of Time Domain Signals

 

Description

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 1 iLab Sallen-Key Active Filter Design

ECET 350 Week 2 Homework

ECET 350 Week 2 iLab Signal Sampling and Reconstruction

ECET 350 Week 3 Homework

ECET 350 Week 3 iLab Moving Average Digital Filters

ECET 350 Week 4 Homework

ECET 350 Week 4 iLab Low-Pass Finite Impulse Response Filter

ECET 350 Week 5 Homework

ECET 350 Week 5 iLab Impulse Response Band Pass Filter

ECET 350 Week 6 Homework

ECET 350 Week 6 iLab Infinite Impulse Response Low-Pass Filter

ECET 350 Week 7 Homework

ECET 350 Week 7 iLab Fourier Analysis of Time Domain Signals

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 1 iLab Sallen-Key Active Filter Design

Laboratory Title: Sallen-Key Active Filter Design
Objectives:
• Design and simulate a Butterworth, low-pass Sallen-Key active filter.
• Construct and test the designed Butterworth, low-pass Sallen-Key active filter.
Results: Summarize your results in the context of your objectives.
A Butterworth low-pass Sallen-Key filter was successfully designed and tested. The filter shows a flat frequency response below the cutoff frequency, with an average roll-off rate of -38.3 dB/decade. The filter operates within the parameters expected of a typical Butterworth low-pass Sallen-Key filter of the second order.
Conclusions: What can you conclude about this lab based on your results?
Given a specifications of one filter, a person can obtain an appropriate design by acquiring the transfer function from the mathematical approximation.

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 2 Homework

Chapter 2, page 58-62, problems 2a, 2b, 2c, 7, 9a, 9b, 9c, 10a, 10b, 16a, 16b, 16c, 19, 21, 22a, 22b, 22c, 24.

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 2 iLab Signal Sampling and Reconstruction

Objectives:

  • Use principles of signal sampling and reconstruction to construct an electronic circuit to sample, hold, and reconstruct the signal.
  • Apply the antialiasing and anti-imaging filters to perform proper simulation of signal sampling and reconstruction.

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 3 Homework

Chapter 3 Homework Problems: 3a, 3b, 3c, 5a, 5c, 5e, 7a, 9

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 3 iLab Moving Average Digital Filters

Chapter 3 Homework Problems: 3a, 3b, 3c, 5a, 5c, 5e, 7a, 9

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 4 iLab Low-Pass Finite Impulse Response Filter

Objectives: Design, implement, test, and analyze the performance of a finite impulse response, low-pass filter in a real-time application using the Tower microcontroller board and ADC and DAC interface board.

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 4 Homework

Chapter 9: Finite Impulse Response Filters, pp. 314–353

Problems: 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 3a, 3b, 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 8e, 8f, 10b, 11b, 12b, 12d, 14a, 14b

ECET 350 Week 7 iLab Fourier Analysis of Time Domain Signals

ECET 350 ECET350 ECET/350 ENTIRE COURSE HELP – DEVRY UNIVERSITY

ECET 350 Week 5 iLab Impulse Response Band Pass Filter

Objectives: Design a high-order, FIR band pass using MATLAB and then to implement, test, and analyze the real-time performance of that filter on a target embedded system board. In addition, introduce and compare the numerical formats and processing requirements of digital filters when implemented using floating point versus fixed point mathematics on an embedded system.

Results: As per the requirement I designed a filter using MatLab that would meet the required pass band.

Conclusions: I wasn’t very happy with my results; even though my filter passes the signal through the pass band it didn’t seem to have very good gain. I’m not sure what caused the loss of gain in relation to unity, but I verified all of my equipment and filters were working correctly.